研究室内レビュー

Zoomの講評会は学生も先生もやや消化不良になる。その要因は対面の説明よりも聴く側の理解に時間がかかるからである。そこで夏休みを利用して、4年生、M1生の前期の製図課題を研究室内で再度レビューした。M2やドクターの目に晒して1人15分かけてゆっくり講評した。もう一回見ると色々な大事なポイントが再度見えてきた。

最後に皆で優秀作を投票。そうするとまた先生たちが選んだものとは違うものが浮き上がってくる。建築ってこう言うものである。

Students and teachers have experienced some digestive problems at Zoom’s review meeting. The reason is that it takes more time for the listener to understand than for the face-to-face explanation. Therefore, during the summer vacation, we reviewed the projects that 4th year and M1 students did in the first half of the year in the laboratory. Exposed to the eyes of M2 and the doctor, one person took 15 minutes to be reviewed and commented. When I saw it again, various important points became visible again.

Finally, everyone voted for the best work. Then again, something different from the ones chosen by the teachers emerges. Architecture is like this.