賞
卒計議論で藤村さんが様々なコンクールが増えたことをどう思うか坂本さんに聞いていた。審査員も何度かしたが、忸怩たる思いだったと。踊らされていたとも言っていた。同感。賞の設置は学生の為半分、建築界でのヘゲモニー獲得のため半分である。世界的に見ても賞は文化的覇権争いのいい道具である。だから要らないかというとあってもいいとは思う。競争は人を駆り立てるのだから。けど商業的になるならやめたほうがいい。
Mr. fujimura asked professor Sakamoto what he thought about the increase in various competitions during the discussion about his graduation project . he did the judges several times, but he said he was embarrassed. he also said he was made to dance. I agree. The establishment of the prize is half for the students and half for the acquisition of hegemony in the architectural world. Even from a global perspective, awards are a good tool for fighting for cultural supremacy. That’s why I think it’s okay to say that you don’t need it. Competition drives people. But if it’s going to be commercial, it’s better not to do it.